Tale of the Mummy (1999)
What is it with the ‘90s? Why do they have to take a good thing and then
just fuck it all up? You’re over thinking things 1990s. Everything is a
goddamn revisionist take. Which in and of itself isn’t necessarily a bad thing
I suppose. There are plenty of revisionist horror films that I really enjoy
(Rosemary’s Baby, The Shining, Psycho, Burial Ground to name just a few). The
problem with the ‘90s (at least as I see it) is that it combines the ‘60s and
‘70s creator driven revisionist bent with the vapidness of ‘80s commercial
filmmaking. Everyone’s doing their genre revisions but no one has anything
fucking useful to say. So if you were going to, say, make a new movie about
mummies, you can’t just get a guy and wrap him in some dusty bandages and send
him out to crush some skulls, oh no. You have to rethink the mummy. It doesn’t
matter if there’s no good reason to rethink mummies, just fucking do it anyway.
You see, this isn’t your daddy’s mummy film, because Russell Muchahy and Miramax
think your dad is an asshole.
So how do these jerks ‘reimagine’ their mummy? Well, what’s the best thing about mummies? If you said the bandages, first of all go fuck yourself and second of all you must be Russell Mulcahy. Seriously, this movie is not about a walking corpse fulfilling an ancient curse, it’s about flying bandages that pull people into toilets. Yeah, they kill one guy by pulling him into a fucking toilet. And it’s not like it has to rip and tear him apart to get him to fit through the drain, it just squeezes him in Looney Tunes style. And of course, this being the late ‘90s, it does this with some of the worst CGI that I’ve ever seen. It really looks like a cartoon which is in complete discord with the fairly serious tone of the film. Really, the CGI is fucking awful in this. It just looks cheap. There are numerous shots of the bandages flying around the city (yeah it looks as stupid as it sounds) that look like shit. It sticks out like a sore thumb. I think what makes it look off to me is that the contrast is different from the computer generated images and the film images. I don’t think that this is a fault of the transfer as the film generally looks OK. Really, the two worst scenes are the toilet scene and Christopher Lee’s death. I won’t give it away as I don’t want to spoil the disappointment.
- Read the full review at UnRatedFilm.com
So how do these jerks ‘reimagine’ their mummy? Well, what’s the best thing about mummies? If you said the bandages, first of all go fuck yourself and second of all you must be Russell Mulcahy. Seriously, this movie is not about a walking corpse fulfilling an ancient curse, it’s about flying bandages that pull people into toilets. Yeah, they kill one guy by pulling him into a fucking toilet. And it’s not like it has to rip and tear him apart to get him to fit through the drain, it just squeezes him in Looney Tunes style. And of course, this being the late ‘90s, it does this with some of the worst CGI that I’ve ever seen. It really looks like a cartoon which is in complete discord with the fairly serious tone of the film. Really, the CGI is fucking awful in this. It just looks cheap. There are numerous shots of the bandages flying around the city (yeah it looks as stupid as it sounds) that look like shit. It sticks out like a sore thumb. I think what makes it look off to me is that the contrast is different from the computer generated images and the film images. I don’t think that this is a fault of the transfer as the film generally looks OK. Really, the two worst scenes are the toilet scene and Christopher Lee’s death. I won’t give it away as I don’t want to spoil the disappointment.
- Read the full review at UnRatedFilm.com
Post a Comment